As I was browsing through the pages of our latest book publication, Metal Ropes, I happened upon the very brief section about bunting. And then it struck me: why has SmallBallSuccess never made a bunting video? Anybody would naturally suppose that the “stickers” of yesteryear would be masters of putting that “dead ball” down. They were considered the ultimate “place hitters” (i.e., artists capable of placing the ball in whatever part of the field they desired). I should really look into this….
Yet when you pause to weigh the issue, Deadball bunting isn’t really very easy to research. Besides the usual problems of having virtually no video and no live shots taken at lightning shutter-speed (which didn’t exist), we have to confront the fact that yesteryear’s batsmen didn’t really use the sacrifice as we do. There wasn’t even a category for “sac bunt” or “sac fly”. The assumption in both of those cases was always that the batter was attempting to reach base and “productively failed”, creating an out that happily managed to move the runner up. It’s hardly a twisted way of thinking: ours today may well be more so. We don’t have a “sacrifice grounder”, do we? Yet Roger Maris once told Mike Shannon that he could collect fifteen or twenty RBI’s a season by deliberately rolling over on a pitch and grounding to the right side with a runner on third. A lot of sabermetricians among us don’t even consider the RBI a legitimate achievement—pretty much the same guys who consider all of Roger’s RBI’s to have been accidents and the man himself to have represented mediocrity that caught fire for one season. (We’ll never know what Maris could have done if the Yankee front office hadn’t suckered him into playing with a broken hamate bone in 1966 that never healed properly thereafter.)
Anyway, my original point (I can never resist defending Roger Maris) was that there’s no clear reason why you should ever give yourself up completely in dropping a bunt: I feel that the oldtimers had that right. Even in Major League games, I see guys square up literally five seconds—or more—before the pitch is ever delivered, and nobody in the stadium has any illusions about their drawing the bat back at the last instant. Then, if they somehow manage to dribble an effective sacrifice, they lope down the line, veering already toward the dugout: never a thought in their satisfied head about putting additional pressure on the defense. No, I don’t know exactly how Willie Keeler, Eddie Collins, or Elmer Flick would have done it… but I know they wouldn’t have done it that way!
I’m actually going to have to devote quite a bit of experimentation to some of the subject’s subtler aspects. I have a few ideas, based upon what I’ve read: that Ty Cobb, for instance, was not averse to faking a bunt and then slapping the ball rather more vigorously—but still not full force—through some vacated quadrant of the infield. This is very fertile territory for a new video series, and I think many older baseball enthusiasts would like to see a return to such play at all levels. It’s no secret that scrappy players who make contact and bat .343 at Double A are less interesting to the Bigs than lumbering Goliaths who get a jack every third game and bat .241… but that may be changing, even among Major League brain trusts. Just look at the success of the Tampa Bay Rays this year!
I’ve already posted (rushed? I hope not) two introductory videos to YouTube. The first is a mere review of the issues, and particularly a contrast of the way bunting is practiced today versus a more Old School approach. The second is my best stab at instruction in sacrifice bunting (yes, the kind that Deadball hitters didn’t admit existed). I have no particular historical record to draw upon, as I’ve said—and I certainly have no personal résumé of achievement on the diamond to establish my authority. The most interesting and promising suggestion I float, I would say, is that players who are struggling at the plate and ready to try anything should consider batting left-handed. At the very least, if you’re equally bad mechanically from the left and right sides, you’ll be closer to first base from the former and thus bound to beat out a few more scratch hits. Maury Wills was going nowhere in the Minors before he tried switch-hitting: a few years later, he broke Ty Cobb’s stolen base record. I’m not even recommending a switcher approach. If you’re fast, just bat left exclusively. Learn to put the ball in play on the left side, where throws to first are longer, and exploit that good break out of the box. This was essentially Ichiro’s game in his best years.
We’ll try to promote various ways of getting the pitch into play on that side in forthcoming videos: the straight bunt isn’t the only tactic, by any means. Some alternatives range between a bunt and a full swing—and these were precisely what Collins, Cobb, et al. had honed to perfection, in my opinion. At any rate, I’m pretty sure that you’ll break into any line-up hitting .400, even if 90 percent of your safeties are singles—and even if 50 percent of those are infield hits!